Lamb, veal & game

Veal, rib, separable lean only, raw

FDC 173828oz (28 g)

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

Density 67 · -5 vs Lamb, veal & game median

Raw lean veal rib scores 67 of 100 for nutrient density, a Good band result, but it ranks only 35th of 60 in Lamb, veal & game, trailing the category median of 72. Protein is the sole standout here at 40% DV, in the excellent tier.

Veal rib is the cut behind delicate chops and scaloppine, usually pounded thin and quickly pan-seared or grilled since the lean meat toughens fast under prolonged heat; a one-ounce (28 g) raw portion scales up to a typical chop weight. It's fairly low in fat at 3.89 g per 100 g, but the score sits below the median for its category, and veal shank or leg round rank higher among veal and game options.

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Fig. 1 · Macronutrient composition
Protein 20 g · 70%Carb 0 g · 0%Fat 3.9 g · 30%

Percent of calories derived by NutriVerdict from USDA grams

Nutrition facts

NutrientAmount% DV
Calories120 kcal6%
Total fat3.9 g5%
Saturated fat1.2 g6%
Cholesterol83 mg28%
Sodium95 mg4%
Carbohydrate0 g0%
Dietary fiber0 g0%
Sugars-
Protein20 g40%
Potassium306 mg7%
Calcium14 mg1%
Iron0.88 mg5%
Magnesium23 mg5%
Vitamin C0 mg0%
Vitamin A0 µg0%
Vitamin E0.21 mg1%

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

FDC 173828

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

What it is rich in

Nutrients supplying at least 10% of the Daily Value per 100 grams. 20% or more is an excellent source.

Protein40% DV

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

Versus the lamb, veal & game median

Nutrient density67 vs 72 median
Protein / 100 g20 vs 21 median
Fiber / 100 g0 vs 0 median
Sodium / 100 g95 vs 79 median

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

More nutrient-dense swaps

Foods in the same category that score higher on nutrient density.

Veal, shank, separable lean and fat, rawDensity 70 vs 67Game meat, opossum, cooked, roastedDensity 70 vs 67Veal, leg (top round), separable lean and fat, rawDensity 71 vs 67

View the USDA source record