Compare foods

Oil, hazelnut vs Salad dressing, sweet and sour

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Salad dressing, sweet and sour is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 83 of 100 to 60 for Oil, hazelnut.

Sweet and sour salad dressing scores notably higher at 83 of 100 against hazelnut oil's 60 of 100, despite the dressing being far lower in calories, 15 kcal per 100 g versus 884 kcal. The oil is pure fat, 100 g per 100 g, with zero sodium, while the dressing carries 208 mg sodium and 3.7 g sugar and carbs in that same weight.

Choose the dressing when a low-calorie condiment fits the meal, keeping the 208 mg sodium per 100 g in mind if using it generously. Choose hazelnut oil for cooking or flavor where a concentrated fat is wanted, understanding it scores lower here largely due to calorie density rather than any single nutrient shown. The scores diverge more than the raw macros alone would suggest.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricOil, hazelnutSalad dressing
Nutrient Density Score6083
Calories884 kcal15 kcal
Protein0 g0.1 g
Carbohydrate0 g3.7 g
Dietary fiber0 g0 g
Sugars0 g3.7 g
Total fat100 g0 g
Saturated fat7.4 g0 g
Sodium0 mg208 mg
Potassium0 mg33 mg
Calcium0 mg4 mg
Iron0 mg0 mg
Magnesium0 mg3 mg
Vitamin C0 mg8.1 mg
Vitamin A0 ug0 ug
Vitamin E47 mg2.6 mg
Cholesterol0 mg0 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Salad dressing, sweet and sour healthier than Oil, hazelnut?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Salad dressing, sweet and sour scores higher, 83 of 100 to 60. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Oil, hazelnut or Salad dressing, sweet and sour?

Salad dressing, sweet and sour has more protein, 0.1 g per 100 g to 0 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Salad dressing, sweet and sour is lower in calories, 15 kcal per 100 g to 884 kcal.

Full Oil, hazelnut profile Full Salad dressing profile