Compare foods

Frog legs, raw vs Mollusks, snail, raw

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Mollusks, snail, raw is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 95 of 100 to 87 for Frog legs, raw.

Mollusks, snail, raw scores 95 of 100, clearly ahead of frog legs, raw at 87 of 100. Frog legs are slightly lower in calories (73 vs 90 per 100 g) and carry no carbohydrate at all versus 2 g in snail, but snail edges out frog legs on protein, 16.1 g versus 16.4 g being nearly tied, while sodium runs higher in snail, 70 mg against 58 mg.

Choose frog legs, raw when you want the lowest calorie count and zero carbohydrate. Choose mollusks, snail, raw when the higher overall nutrient density score matters more and the modest sodium difference is not a concern. Protein levels are close enough between the two that the choice mostly comes down to calories and sodium.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricFrog legs, rawMollusks, snail
Nutrient Density Score8795
Calories73 kcal90 kcal
Protein16 g16 g
Carbohydrate0 g2 g
Dietary fiber0 g0 g
Sugars0 g0 g
Total fat0.3 g1.4 g
Saturated fat0.1 g0.4 g
Sodium58 mg70 mg
Potassium285 mg382 mg
Calcium18 mg10 mg
Iron1.5 mg3.5 mg
Magnesium20 mg250 mg
Vitamin C0 mg0 mg
Vitamin A15 ug30 ug
Vitamin E1 mg5 mg
Cholesterol50 mg50 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Mollusks, snail, raw healthier than Frog legs, raw?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Mollusks, snail, raw scores higher, 95 of 100 to 87. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Frog legs, raw or Mollusks, snail, raw?

Frog legs, raw has more protein, 16.4 g per 100 g to 16.1 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Frog legs, raw is lower in calories, 73 kcal per 100 g to 90 kcal.

Full Frog legs, raw profile Full Mollusks, snail profile