Grains & pasta

Rye grain

FDC 168884cup (169 g)

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

Density 66 · +2 vs Grains & pasta median

Rye grain scores 66 of 100, placing it in the Good band and 21 of 60 in Grains & pasta, and its dietary fiber content does the heavy lifting at 54% DV per serving, the highest reading in its profile. Magnesium follows at 26% DV and protein at 21% DV, giving whole rye a denser nutrient spread than most refined grains.

Rye is the backbone of dense European breads and crispbreads, and its assertive, slightly sour flavor holds up well against cured meats and cheese. A cup of the grain is 169 g and 338 calories per 100 g, so it cooks up hearty rather than light, and sodium is essentially negligible at 2 mg per 100 g, leaving seasoning entirely up to the cook.

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Fig. 1 · Macronutrient composition
Protein 10.3 g · 11%Carb 75.9 g · 84%Fat 1.6 g · 4%

Percent of calories derived by NutriVerdict from USDA grams

Nutrition facts

NutrientAmount% DV
Calories338 kcal17%
Total fat1.6 g2%
Saturated fat0.2 g1%
Cholesterol0 mg0%
Sodium2 mg0%
Carbohydrate76 g28%
Dietary fiber15 g54%
Sugars0.98 g
Protein10 g21%
Potassium510 mg11%
Calcium24 mg2%
Iron2.6 mg15%
Magnesium110 mg26%
Vitamin C0 mg0%
Vitamin A1 µg0%
Vitamin E0.85 mg6%

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

FDC 168884

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

What it is rich in

Nutrients supplying at least 10% of the Daily Value per 100 grams. 20% or more is an excellent source.

Dietary fiber54% DV
Magnesium26% DV
Protein21% DV
Iron15% DV
Potassium11% DV

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

Versus the grains & pasta median

Nutrient density66 vs 64 median
Protein / 100 g10 vs 11 median
Fiber / 100 g15 vs 6.7 median
Sodium / 100 g2 vs 5 median

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

More nutrient-dense swaps

Foods in the same category that score higher on nutrient density.

Wheat, hard red springDensity 67 vs 66Quinoa, cookedDensity 67 vs 66Spelt, cookedDensity 67 vs 66

View the USDA source record