Grains & pasta

Wheat, hard red spring

FDC 168889cup (192 g)

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

Density 67 · +3 vs Grains & pasta median

Hard red spring wheat posts a Nutrient Density Score of 67 of 100, a Good band result ranking 20th of 60 in Grains & pasta, edging out the category median of 64. Its profile is broadly excellent-tier: dietary fiber at 44% DV, protein at 31% DV, magnesium at 30% DV, and iron at 20% DV.

This is the hard wheat variety milled into bread flour for its strong gluten, though the whole kernels can also be cooked and eaten as a chewy grain, with a cup (192 g) delivering 12.2 g of fiber and 15.4 g of protein. At 329 calories per 100 g in this dry, uncooked form it's calorie-dense, so portions are best measured rather than poured freely, and sodium is negligible at 2 mg unless it's salted.

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Fig. 1 · Macronutrient composition
Protein 15.4 g · 18%Carb 68 g · 78%Fat 1.9 g · 5%

Percent of calories derived by NutriVerdict from USDA grams

Nutrition facts

NutrientAmount% DV
Calories329 kcal16%
Total fat1.9 g2%
Saturated fat0.31 g2%
Cholesterol0 mg0%
Sodium2 mg0%
Carbohydrate68 g25%
Dietary fiber12 g44%
Sugars0.41 g
Protein15 g31%
Potassium340 mg7%
Calcium25 mg2%
Iron3.6 mg20%
Magnesium124 mg30%
Vitamin C0 mg0%
Vitamin A0 µg0%
Vitamin E1 mg7%

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

FDC 168889

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

What it is rich in

Nutrients supplying at least 10% of the Daily Value per 100 grams. 20% or more is an excellent source.

Dietary fiber44% DV
Protein31% DV
Magnesium30% DV
Iron20% DV

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

Versus the grains & pasta median

Nutrient density67 vs 64 median
Protein / 100 g15 vs 11 median
Fiber / 100 g12 vs 6.7 median
Sodium / 100 g2 vs 5 median

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

More nutrient-dense swaps

Foods in the same category that score higher on nutrient density.

Quinoa, cookedDensity 67 vs 67Spelt, cookedDensity 67 vs 67Barley, hulledDensity 68 vs 67

View the USDA source record