Dairy & eggs

Parmesan cheese topping, fat free

FDC 172206tablespoon (5 g)

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

Density 62 · +27 vs Dairy & eggs median

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie relative to the foods we cover, Parmesan cheese topping, fat free is a strongly nutrient-dense choice at 62 of 100. Within dairy & eggs it ranks 6 of 60. Per 100 grams it is an excellent source of protein (80% DV), an excellent source of calcium (62% DV), an excellent source of iron (28% DV). Most of its 370 calories per 100 grams come from protein. Worth noting: it is high in sodium (1150 mg per 100 g).

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Fig. 1 · Macronutrient composition
Protein 40 g · 44%Carb 40 g · 44%Fat 5 g · 12%

Percent of calories derived by NutriVerdict from USDA grams

Nutrition facts

NutrientAmount% DV
Calories370 kcal19%
Total fat5 g6%
Saturated fat3.1 g16%
Cholesterol20 mg7%
Sodium1150 mg50%
Carbohydrate40 g15%
Dietary fiber0 g0%
Sugars1.5 g
Protein40 g80%
Potassium600 mg13%
Calcium800 mg62%
Iron5 mg28%
Magnesium40 mg10%
Vitamin C0 mg0%
Vitamin A40 µg4%
Vitamin E0.04 mg0%

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

FDC 172206

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

What it is rich in

Nutrients supplying at least 10% of the Daily Value per 100 grams. 20% or more is an excellent source.

Protein80% DV
Calcium62% DV
Iron28% DV
Potassium13% DV
Magnesium10% DV

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

Versus the dairy & eggs median

Nutrient density62 vs 35 median
Protein / 100 g40 vs 9 median
Fiber / 100 g0 vs 0 median
Sodium / 100 g1150 vs 162 median

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

More nutrient-dense swaps

Foods in the same category that score higher on nutrient density.

Egg, whole, raw, freshDensity 62 vs 62Milk, reduced fat, fluid, 2% milkfat, with added nonfat milk solids, without added vitamin ADensity 65 vs 62Milk, reduced fat, fluid, 2% milkfat, with added nonfat milk solids and vitamin A and vitamin DDensity 70 vs 62

View the USDA source record