Nuts & seeds

Nuts, butternuts, dried

FDC 170570cup (120 g)

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

Density 55 · -10 vs Nuts & seeds median

Dried butternuts, the native North American relative of the walnut, score 55 of 100 for a Fair rating, ranking 40th of 60 in Nuts & seeds. The mineral numbers are striking: magnesium reaches 56% DV and protein 50% DV, both excellent, with iron adding 22% DV and fiber 17% DV.

Butternuts are less common than walnuts or pecans but show up dried or roasted in regional baking and as a snack on their own. They are dense, at 612 calories per 100 grams and 57 grams of fat per 100 grams, so a small handful goes further than it looks. With a category median of 65, pistachios or pine nuts sit ahead of butternuts if a higher-scoring option is the goal.

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Fig. 1 · Macronutrient composition
Protein 24.9 g · 15%Carb 12 g · 7%Fat 57 g · 78%

Percent of calories derived by NutriVerdict from USDA grams

Nutrition facts

NutrientAmount% DV
Calories612 kcal31%
Total fat57 g73%
Saturated fat1.3 g7%
Cholesterol0 mg0%
Sodium1 mg0%
Carbohydrate12 g4%
Dietary fiber4.7 g17%
Sugars-
Protein25 g50%
Potassium421 mg9%
Calcium53 mg4%
Iron4 mg22%
Magnesium237 mg56%
Vitamin C3.2 mg4%
Vitamin A6 µg1%
Vitamin E-

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

FDC 170570

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

What it is rich in

Nutrients supplying at least 10% of the Daily Value per 100 grams. 20% or more is an excellent source.

Magnesium56% DV
Protein50% DV
Iron22% DV
Dietary fiber17% DV

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

Versus the nuts & seeds median

Nutrient density55 vs 65 median
Protein / 100 g25 vs 15 median
Fiber / 100 g4.7 vs 6 median
Sodium / 100 g1 vs 12 median

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

More nutrient-dense swaps

Foods in the same category that score higher on nutrient density.

Nuts, pistachio nuts, rawDensity 55 vs 55Nuts, pine nuts, driedDensity 56 vs 55Seeds, safflower seed kernels, driedDensity 57 vs 55

View the USDA source record