Nuts & seeds

Nuts, almond paste

FDC 170160oz (28 g)

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

Density 52 · -13 vs Nuts & seeds median

Almond paste earns a Fair 52 of 100, ranking 44th of 60 in the nuts and seeds category, anchored by vitamin E at an excellent 90% DV and magnesium at 31% DV, with protein and dietary fiber each landing in the good range at 18% and 17% DV.

Made from ground almonds and sugar, this paste is a baking staple for marzipan-style fillings, cookies, and pastries, with an ounce (28 g) delivering a dense 458 calories per 100 g. The tradeoff is sugar, flagged high at 36.2 g per 100 g, and since the score sits below the nuts category's median of 65, plain cashew nuts, raw, is a higher-ranked swap for anyone watching added sugar.

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Fig. 1 · Macronutrient composition
Protein 9 g · 8%Carb 47.8 g · 40%Fat 27.7 g · 52%

Percent of calories derived by NutriVerdict from USDA grams

Nutrition facts

NutrientAmount% DV
Calories458 kcal23%
Total fat28 g36%
Saturated fat2.6 g13%
Cholesterol0 mg0%
Sodium9 mg0%
Carbohydrate48 g17%
Dietary fiber4.8 g17%
Sugars36 g
Protein9 g18%
Potassium314 mg7%
Calcium172 mg13%
Iron1.6 mg9%
Magnesium130 mg31%
Vitamin C0.1 mg0%
Vitamin A0 µg0%
Vitamin E14 mg90%

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

FDC 170160

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

What it is rich in

Nutrients supplying at least 10% of the Daily Value per 100 grams. 20% or more is an excellent source.

Vitamin E90% DV
Magnesium31% DV
Protein18% DV
Dietary fiber17% DV
Calcium13% DV

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

Versus the nuts & seeds median

Nutrient density52 vs 65 median
Protein / 100 g9 vs 15 median
Fiber / 100 g4.8 vs 6 median
Sodium / 100 g9 vs 12 median

Original analysis by NutriVerdict

More nutrient-dense swaps

Foods in the same category that score higher on nutrient density.

Nuts, cashew nuts, rawDensity 53 vs 52Nuts, chestnuts, european, roastedDensity 54 vs 52Nuts, walnuts, black, driedDensity 54 vs 52

View the USDA source record