Compare foods

Pate, truffle flavor vs Scrapple, pork

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Pate, truffle flavor is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 88 of 100 to 58 for Scrapple, pork.

Pate, truffle flavor scores 88 of 100 versus 58 of 100 for scrapple, pork. The pate is notably higher in fat (28.5 g vs 13.9 g) and sodium (807 mg vs 482 mg) per 100 g, while scrapple carries more carbohydrate (14.1 g vs 6.3 g) and a small amount of fiber, 0.3 g, along with fewer calories overall (213 vs 327).

Choose the truffle pate when protein (11.2 g vs 8.06 g) and richer flavor matter more than calorie or sodium load. Choose scrapple when you want a lighter option on both fat and calories, accepting more carbohydrate in the mix. Both are processed pork products, so portion size matters for either choice.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricPate, truffle flavorScrapple, pork
Nutrient Density Score8858
Calories327 kcal213 kcal
Protein11 g8.1 g
Carbohydrate6.3 g14 g
Dietary fiber-0.3 g
Sugars-0.2 g
Total fat29 g14 g
Saturated fat10 g4.7 g
Sodium807 mg482 mg
Potassium138 mg158 mg
Calcium70 mg7 mg
Iron3.9 mg1.9 mg
Magnesium13 mg13 mg
Vitamin C2 mg2.5 mg
Vitamin A4500 ug626 ug
Vitamin E-0.2 mg
Cholesterol105 mg49 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Pate, truffle flavor healthier than Scrapple, pork?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Pate, truffle flavor scores higher, 88 of 100 to 58. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Pate, truffle flavor or Scrapple, pork?

Pate, truffle flavor has more protein, 11.2 g per 100 g to 8.1 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Scrapple, pork is lower in calories, 213 kcal per 100 g to 327 kcal.

Full Pate, truffle flavor profile Full Scrapple, pork profile