Compare foods

Pate, chicken liver, canned vs Pate, truffle flavor

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Pate, truffle flavor is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 88 of 100 to 70 for Pate, chicken liver, canned.

Pate, truffle flavor scores higher at 88 of 100 compared with 70 of 100 for canned chicken liver pate. The truffle version is considerably richer, with more fat (28.5 g vs 13.1 g), more calories (327 vs 201), and more sodium (807 mg vs 386 mg) per 100 g, while carrying slightly less protein (11.2 g vs 13.4 g).

Choose the chicken liver pate when you want less fat, fewer calories, and roughly half the sodium in the same portion size. Choose the truffle pate when you are after a richer spread and are less concerned with fat or sodium load. Worth noting: the truffle pate's higher score does not make it a low-calorie or low-sodium choice.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricPate, chicken liverPate, truffle flavor
Nutrient Density Score7088
Calories201 kcal327 kcal
Protein13 g11 g
Carbohydrate6.6 g6.3 g
Dietary fiber0 g-
Sugars0 g-
Total fat13 g29 g
Saturated fat4 g10 g
Sodium386 mg807 mg
Potassium95 mg138 mg
Calcium10 mg70 mg
Iron9.2 mg3.9 mg
Magnesium13 mg13 mg
Vitamin C10 mg2 mg
Vitamin A217 ug4500 ug
Vitamin E1 mg-
Cholesterol391 mg105 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Pate, truffle flavor healthier than Pate, chicken liver, canned?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Pate, truffle flavor scores higher, 88 of 100 to 70. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Pate, chicken liver, canned or Pate, truffle flavor?

Pate, chicken liver, canned has more protein, 13.4 g per 100 g to 11.2 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Pate, chicken liver, canned is lower in calories, 201 kcal per 100 g to 327 kcal.

Full Pate, chicken liver profile Full Pate, truffle flavor profile