Compare foods

Oil, almond vs Oil, hazelnut

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Oil, hazelnut is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 60 of 100 to 54 for Oil, almond.

Hazelnut oil edges out almond oil on nutrient density, 60 of 100 versus 54 of 100, even though the two share an identical basic profile per 100 g: 884 calories, 100 g fat, and zero protein, carbohydrate, fiber, sugar, or sodium. With macros this closely matched, the score gap comes down to differences in fat quality and composition rather than anything visible in these headline numbers.

Choose hazelnut oil if you're leaning on the higher nutrient density score as a tiebreaker; choose almond oil if you prefer its flavor or price point, since neither will change your calorie or fat intake meaningfully. Honestly, at the macro level these two are nearly indistinguishable, so this is a close call best settled by taste and use case rather than nutrition.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricOil, almondOil, hazelnut
Nutrient Density Score5460
Calories884 kcal884 kcal
Protein0 g0 g
Carbohydrate0 g0 g
Dietary fiber0 g0 g
Sugars0 g0 g
Total fat100 g100 g
Saturated fat8.2 g7.4 g
Sodium0 mg0 mg
Potassium0 mg0 mg
Calcium0 mg0 mg
Iron0 mg0 mg
Magnesium0 mg0 mg
Vitamin C0 mg0 mg
Vitamin A0 ug0 ug
Vitamin E39 mg47 mg
Cholesterol0 mg0 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Oil, hazelnut healthier than Oil, almond?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Oil, hazelnut scores higher, 60 of 100 to 54. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Oil, almond or Oil, hazelnut?

Oil, almond has more protein, 0 g per 100 g to 0 g.

Full Oil, almond profile Full Oil, hazelnut profile