Compare foods

Game meat, elk, raw vs Game meat, moose, raw

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Game meat, moose, raw is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 85 of 100 to 81 for Game meat, elk, raw.

Raw moose scores meaningfully higher on nutrient density, 85 of 100 against elk's 81 of 100, largely on the strength of lower fat and fewer calories. Moose has 0.74 g of fat and 102 calories per 100 g, versus elk's 1.45 g of fat and 111 calories. Elk edges ahead slightly on protein, 23 g per 100 g compared to moose's 22.2 g, while moose runs a bit higher in sodium, 65 mg versus elk's 58 mg.

Choose moose when a lower-fat, lower-calorie game meat is the priority, since it wins clearly on both measures. Choose elk when the marginal protein advantage outweighs the fat and calorie difference, or when sodium needs to stay lower. The four-point score gap here is driven mostly by moose's leaner fat profile rather than a large protein difference.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricGame meat, elkGame meat, moose
Nutrient Density Score8185
Calories111 kcal102 kcal
Protein23 g22 g
Carbohydrate0 g0 g
Dietary fiber0 g0 g
Sugars--
Total fat1.5 g0.7 g
Saturated fat0.5 g0.2 g
Sodium58 mg65 mg
Potassium312 mg317 mg
Calcium4 mg5 mg
Iron2.8 mg3.2 mg
Magnesium23 mg23 mg
Vitamin C0 mg4 mg
Vitamin A0 ug0 ug
Vitamin E--
Cholesterol55 mg59 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Game meat, moose, raw healthier than Game meat, elk, raw?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Game meat, moose, raw scores higher, 85 of 100 to 81. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Game meat, elk, raw or Game meat, moose, raw?

Game meat, elk, raw has more protein, 23 g per 100 g to 22.2 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Game meat, moose, raw is lower in calories, 102 kcal per 100 g to 111 kcal.

Full Game meat, elk profile Full Game meat, moose profile