Compare foods

Frog legs, raw vs Turtle, green, raw

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Frog legs, raw is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 87 of 100 to 86 for Turtle, green, raw.

These two land close together: raw frog legs score 87 of 100, just edging out green turtle at 86 of 100. Frog legs are notably lighter, at 73 calories per 100 g versus turtle's 89, and lower in sodium too (58 mg vs 68 mg). Turtle counters with more protein, 19.8 g against 16.4 g for frog legs, and slightly more fat (0.5 g vs 0.3 g), though both remain very lean.

Choose frog legs when a lower-calorie, lower-sodium seafood option matters most. Choose turtle when maximizing protein per 100 g is the goal and a few extra calories are acceptable. With scores only a point apart, this is close to a toss-up, and the practical difference mostly comes down to whether you weight protein grams or calorie count more heavily.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricFrog legs, rawTurtle, green
Nutrient Density Score8786
Calories73 kcal89 kcal
Protein16 g20 g
Carbohydrate0 g0 g
Dietary fiber0 g0 g
Sugars0 g0 g
Total fat0.3 g0.5 g
Saturated fat0.1 g0.1 g
Sodium58 mg68 mg
Potassium285 mg230 mg
Calcium18 mg118 mg
Iron1.5 mg1.4 mg
Magnesium20 mg20 mg
Vitamin C0 mg0 mg
Vitamin A15 ug30 ug
Vitamin E1 mg0.5 mg
Cholesterol50 mg50 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Frog legs, raw healthier than Turtle, green, raw?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Frog legs, raw scores higher, 87 of 100 to 86. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Frog legs, raw or Turtle, green, raw?

Turtle, green, raw has more protein, 19.8 g per 100 g to 16.4 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Frog legs, raw is lower in calories, 73 kcal per 100 g to 89 kcal.

Full Frog legs, raw profile Full Turtle, green profile