Compare foods

Fish, ling, raw vs Turtle, green, raw

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Turtle, green, raw is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 86 of 100 to 85 for Fish, ling, raw.

Green turtle scores marginally higher on nutrient density, 86 of 100 versus 85 of 100 for raw ling, and the two are close on most numbers. Calories sit near identical (89 for turtle, 87 for ling), and protein is close too, 19.8 g for turtle against 19 g for ling. The standout difference is sodium: ling carries 135 mg per 100 g, nearly double turtle's 68 mg.

Choose turtle when lowering sodium is the priority, since the gap here is substantial for otherwise similar foods. Choose ling when it's simply the more available option, as the protein and calorie profiles barely differ. With scores just one point apart, this pairing is close overall, and sodium is the number that actually separates them in practice.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricFish, lingTurtle, green
Nutrient Density Score8586
Calories87 kcal89 kcal
Protein19 g20 g
Carbohydrate0 g0 g
Dietary fiber0 g0 g
Sugars-0 g
Total fat0.6 g0.5 g
Saturated fat0.1 g0.1 g
Sodium135 mg68 mg
Potassium379 mg230 mg
Calcium34 mg118 mg
Iron0.7 mg1.4 mg
Magnesium63 mg20 mg
Vitamin C0 mg0 mg
Vitamin A30 ug30 ug
Vitamin E-0.5 mg
Cholesterol40 mg50 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Turtle, green, raw healthier than Fish, ling, raw?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Turtle, green, raw scores higher, 86 of 100 to 85. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Fish, ling, raw or Turtle, green, raw?

Turtle, green, raw has more protein, 19.8 g per 100 g to 19 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Fish, ling, raw is lower in calories, 87 kcal per 100 g to 89 kcal.

Full Fish, ling profile Full Turtle, green profile