Fish, ling, raw vs Frog legs, raw
Original comparison by NutriVerdict
Bottom line: Frog legs, raw is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 87 of 100 to 85 for Fish, ling, raw.
Raw frog legs edge out raw ling on nutrient density, scoring 87 of 100 against ling's 85 of 100. The clearest difference is sodium: frog legs sit at 58 mg per 100 g while ling comes in much higher at 135 mg. Frog legs are also lighter overall, 73 calories versus 87 for ling, though ling supplies more protein, 19 g compared to 16.4 g.
Choose frog legs when cutting sodium or calories is the priority, since both figures are noticeably lower here. Choose ling when protein grams per 100 g matter more than the sodium difference. Neither carries carbs or fiber, so the decision really comes down to sodium versus protein, and ling's higher sodium is worth noting if salt intake is a concern.
Head to head, per 100 g
| Metric | Fish, ling | Frog legs, raw |
|---|---|---|
| Nutrient Density Score | 85 | 87 |
| Calories | 87 kcal | 73 kcal |
| Protein | 19 g | 16 g |
| Carbohydrate | 0 g | 0 g |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | - | 0 g |
| Total fat | 0.6 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sodium | 135 mg | 58 mg |
| Potassium | 379 mg | 285 mg |
| Calcium | 34 mg | 18 mg |
| Iron | 0.7 mg | 1.5 mg |
| Magnesium | 63 mg | 20 mg |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 0 mg |
| Vitamin A | 30 ug | 15 ug |
| Vitamin E | - | 1 mg |
| Cholesterol | 40 mg | 50 mg |
Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain
Frequently asked questions
Is Frog legs, raw healthier than Fish, ling, raw?
On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Frog legs, raw scores higher, 87 of 100 to 85. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.
Which has more protein, Fish, ling, raw or Frog legs, raw?
Fish, ling, raw has more protein, 19 g per 100 g to 16.4 g.
Which has fewer calories?
Frog legs, raw is lower in calories, 73 kcal per 100 g to 87 kcal.