Fish, ling, raw vs Fish, mahimahi, raw
Original comparison by NutriVerdict
Bottom line: Fish, ling, raw is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 85 of 100 to 84 for Fish, mahimahi, raw.
Raw ling scores slightly higher on nutrient density, 85 of 100 against mahimahi's 84 of 100, with both foods sitting in a similar calorie range (87 for ling, 85 for mahimahi). Protein is close too, 19 g for ling versus 18.5 g for mahimahi. The clearer gap is sodium: ling comes in at 135 mg per 100 g compared to mahimahi's 88 mg.
Choose mahimahi when a lower-sodium option is preferred, since the difference is meaningful even though the scores are close. Choose ling when the slightly higher nutrient density score and marginally more protein matter more than the sodium gap. Overall this is a near-even pairing, and sodium is the figure most likely to tip a decision either way.
Head to head, per 100 g
| Metric | Fish, ling | Fish, mahimahi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutrient Density Score | 85 | 84 |
| Calories | 87 kcal | 85 kcal |
| Protein | 19 g | 19 g |
| Carbohydrate | 0 g | 0 g |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | - | - |
| Total fat | 0.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sodium | 135 mg | 88 mg |
| Potassium | 379 mg | 416 mg |
| Calcium | 34 mg | 15 mg |
| Iron | 0.7 mg | 1.1 mg |
| Magnesium | 63 mg | 30 mg |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 0 mg |
| Vitamin A | 30 ug | 54 ug |
| Vitamin E | - | - |
| Cholesterol | 40 mg | 73 mg |
Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain
Frequently asked questions
Is Fish, ling, raw healthier than Fish, mahimahi, raw?
On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Fish, ling, raw scores higher, 85 of 100 to 84. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.
Which has more protein, Fish, ling, raw or Fish, mahimahi, raw?
Fish, ling, raw has more protein, 19 g per 100 g to 18.5 g.
Which has fewer calories?
Fish, mahimahi, raw is lower in calories, 85 kcal per 100 g to 87 kcal.