Fish, cusk, raw vs Turtle, green, raw
Original comparison by NutriVerdict
Bottom line: Turtle, green, raw is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 86 of 100 to 84 for Fish, cusk, raw.
Green turtle scores higher on nutrient density, 86 of 100 against raw cusk's 84 of 100, though the two share nearly the same calorie count, 89 for turtle versus 87 for cusk. Turtle also has a slight protein edge, 19.8 g per 100 g compared to cusk's 19 g. Sodium tells the opposite story: cusk is far lower at 31 mg per 100 g, versus 68 mg for turtle.
Choose turtle when the higher overall score and marginally more protein matter most. Choose cusk when minimizing sodium is the priority, since it comes in at less than half of turtle's level. Both are essentially carb-free and fiber-free, so this pairing is really a trade of a slightly better score for a meaningfully lower sodium count.
Head to head, per 100 g
| Metric | Fish, cusk | Turtle, green |
|---|---|---|
| Nutrient Density Score | 84 | 86 |
| Calories | 87 kcal | 89 kcal |
| Protein | 19 g | 20 g |
| Carbohydrate | 0 g | 0 g |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | - | 0 g |
| Total fat | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sodium | 31 mg | 68 mg |
| Potassium | 392 mg | 230 mg |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 118 mg |
| Iron | 0.8 mg | 1.4 mg |
| Magnesium | 31 mg | 20 mg |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 0 mg |
| Vitamin A | 18 ug | 30 ug |
| Vitamin E | - | 0.5 mg |
| Cholesterol | 41 mg | 50 mg |
Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain
Frequently asked questions
Is Turtle, green, raw healthier than Fish, cusk, raw?
On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Turtle, green, raw scores higher, 86 of 100 to 84. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.
Which has more protein, Fish, cusk, raw or Turtle, green, raw?
Turtle, green, raw has more protein, 19.8 g per 100 g to 19 g.
Which has fewer calories?
Fish, cusk, raw is lower in calories, 87 kcal per 100 g to 89 kcal.