Compare foods

Emu, fan fillet, raw vs Goose, liver, raw

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Goose, liver, raw is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 97 of 100 to 87 for Emu, fan fillet, raw.

Goose liver raw scores highest in this pair at 97 of 100, versus 87 of 100 for emu fan fillet raw. Emu fan fillet is leaner, with 22.5g protein and 0.8g fat per 100g against 16.4g protein and 4.28g fat in goose liver, while goose liver carries some carbs (6.32g) that the emu fillet has none of. Goose liver is slightly higher in calories (133 vs 103) and sodium (140mg vs 120mg).

Choose emu fan fillet raw when maximizing protein per calorie and keeping fat low is the goal, since it delivers more protein at fewer calories. Choose goose liver raw when its higher overall nutrient density score matters more than lean protein content alone. Goose liver's carb content is unusual for a meat, worth noting for anyone tracking carbohydrates alongside protein sources.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricEmu, fan filletGoose, liver
Nutrient Density Score8797
Calories103 kcal133 kcal
Protein23 g16 g
Carbohydrate0 g6.3 g
Dietary fiber0 g0 g
Sugars0 g-
Total fat0.8 g4.3 g
Saturated fat0.2 g1.6 g
Sodium120 mg140 mg
Potassium300 mg230 mg
Calcium3 mg43 mg
Iron4.5 mg31 mg
Magnesium42 mg24 mg
Vitamin C0 mg4.5 mg
Vitamin A0 ug9310 ug
Vitamin E0.2 mg-
Cholesterol71 mg515 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Goose, liver, raw healthier than Emu, fan fillet, raw?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Goose, liver, raw scores higher, 97 of 100 to 87. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Emu, fan fillet, raw or Goose, liver, raw?

Emu, fan fillet, raw has more protein, 22.5 g per 100 g to 16.4 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Emu, fan fillet, raw is lower in calories, 103 kcal per 100 g to 133 kcal.

Full Emu, fan fillet profile Full Goose, liver profile