Compare foods

Chicory greens, raw vs Nopales, raw

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Chicory greens, raw is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 100 of 100 to 99 for Nopales, raw.

Chicory greens score 100 of 100 for nutrient density, just ahead of nopales at 99. Chicory has more protein (1.7 g vs 1.32 g) and more fiber (4 g vs 2.2 g) per 100 g, but nopales is lower in calories (16 vs 23) and lower in sodium (21 mg vs 45 mg).

Choose chicory greens when fiber and protein per serving matter more. Choose nopales when you want a lower-calorie, lower-sodium option. The score difference is small, so either fits comfortably as a nutrient-dense vegetable choice; nopales' lower numbers across the board reflect its higher water content.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricChicory greens, rawNopales, raw
Nutrient Density Score10099
Calories23 kcal16 kcal
Protein1.7 g1.3 g
Carbohydrate4.7 g3.3 g
Dietary fiber4 g2.2 g
Sugars0.7 g1.2 g
Total fat0.3 g0.1 g
Saturated fat0.1 g0 g
Sodium45 mg21 mg
Potassium420 mg257 mg
Calcium100 mg164 mg
Iron0.9 mg0.6 mg
Magnesium30 mg52 mg
Vitamin C24 mg9.3 mg
Vitamin A286 ug23 ug
Vitamin E2.3 mg0 mg
Cholesterol0 mg0 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Chicory greens, raw healthier than Nopales, raw?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Chicory greens, raw scores higher, 100 of 100 to 99. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Chicory greens, raw or Nopales, raw?

Chicory greens, raw has more protein, 1.7 g per 100 g to 1.3 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Nopales, raw is lower in calories, 16 kcal per 100 g to 23 kcal.

Which has more fiber?

Chicory greens, raw has more dietary fiber, 4 g per 100 g to 2.2 g.

Full Chicory greens, raw profile Full Nopales, raw profile