Compare foods

Beet greens, raw vs Watercress, raw

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Beet greens, raw and Watercress, raw score the same on nutrient density, 100 of 100.

Beet greens and watercress both score 100 of 100. Beet greens have more than seven times the fiber of watercress per 100 g (3.7 g vs 0.5 g) but also far more sodium (226 mg vs 41 mg), while watercress is lower in calories (11 vs 22) and carbohydrate (1.29 g vs 4.33 g). Protein is nearly equal for both (2.2 g vs 2.3 g).

Choose beet greens when fiber is the priority and sodium intake isn't a concern that day. Choose watercress when you want a very low-calorie, low-sodium option for salads or garnishes. The sodium gap here is large enough to matter if you're tracking intake closely, even though both rank at the top for nutrient density.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricBeet greens, rawWatercress, raw
Nutrient Density Score100100
Calories22 kcal11 kcal
Protein2.2 g2.3 g
Carbohydrate4.3 g1.3 g
Dietary fiber3.7 g0.5 g
Sugars0.5 g0.2 g
Total fat0.1 g0.1 g
Saturated fat0 g0 g
Sodium226 mg41 mg
Potassium762 mg330 mg
Calcium117 mg120 mg
Iron2.6 mg0.2 mg
Magnesium70 mg21 mg
Vitamin C30 mg43 mg
Vitamin A316 ug160 ug
Vitamin E1.5 mg1 mg
Cholesterol0 mg0 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Which has more protein, Beet greens, raw or Watercress, raw?

Watercress, raw has more protein, 2.3 g per 100 g to 2.2 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Watercress, raw is lower in calories, 11 kcal per 100 g to 22 kcal.

Which has more fiber?

Beet greens, raw has more dietary fiber, 3.7 g per 100 g to 0.5 g.

Full Beet greens, raw profile Full Watercress, raw profile