Compare foods

Pate, chicken liver, canned vs Scrapple, pork

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Pate, chicken liver, canned is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 70 of 100 to 58 for Scrapple, pork.

Canned chicken liver pate scores higher, 70 of 100 versus 58 of 100 for scrapple, pork. Calories are similar (201 vs 213 per 100 g), but the pate has notably more protein (13.4 g vs 8.06 g) and less sodium (386 mg vs 482 mg), while scrapple carries more carbohydrate (14.1 g vs 6.55 g) and a trace of fiber, 0.3 g.

Choose the pate when protein per calorie and lower sodium are priorities. Choose scrapple if you prefer a product built more around carbohydrate than fat, with fat levels close between the two (13.1 g vs 13.9 g). Neither is a low-sodium food, so both call for modest portions.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricPate, chicken liverScrapple, pork
Nutrient Density Score7058
Calories201 kcal213 kcal
Protein13 g8.1 g
Carbohydrate6.6 g14 g
Dietary fiber0 g0.3 g
Sugars0 g0.2 g
Total fat13 g14 g
Saturated fat4 g4.7 g
Sodium386 mg482 mg
Potassium95 mg158 mg
Calcium10 mg7 mg
Iron9.2 mg1.9 mg
Magnesium13 mg13 mg
Vitamin C10 mg2.5 mg
Vitamin A217 ug626 ug
Vitamin E1 mg0.2 mg
Cholesterol391 mg49 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Pate, chicken liver, canned healthier than Scrapple, pork?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Pate, chicken liver, canned scores higher, 70 of 100 to 58. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Pate, chicken liver, canned or Scrapple, pork?

Pate, chicken liver, canned has more protein, 13.4 g per 100 g to 8.1 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Pate, chicken liver, canned is lower in calories, 201 kcal per 100 g to 213 kcal.

Which has more fiber?

Scrapple, pork has more dietary fiber, 0.3 g per 100 g to 0 g.

Full Pate, chicken liver profile Full Scrapple, pork profile