Compare foods

Oil, almond vs Oil, rice bran

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Oil, almond is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 54 of 100 to 43 for Oil, rice bran.

Almond oil scores clearly higher for nutrient density than rice bran oil, 54 of 100 versus 43 of 100, even though both share the identical basic profile of 884 calories and 100 g fat per 100 g with zero protein, carbohydrate, fiber, sugar, or sodium. That 11-point gap is driven by differences in fat composition rather than calories, since the two match exactly on every other measured figure.

Choose almond oil when the nutrient density score matters to you; choose rice bran oil for its high smoke point and neutral flavor in stir-frying or deep-frying. One honest note: both oils deliver the same dense 884 calories per 100 g, so neither is a lower-calorie option, and the choice comes down to fat quality and cooking performance rather than macros.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricOil, almondOil, rice bran
Nutrient Density Score5443
Calories884 kcal884 kcal
Protein0 g0 g
Carbohydrate0 g0 g
Dietary fiber0 g0 g
Sugars0 g0 g
Total fat100 g100 g
Saturated fat8.2 g20 g
Sodium0 mg0 mg
Potassium0 mg0 mg
Calcium0 mg0 mg
Iron0 mg0.1 mg
Magnesium0 mg0 mg
Vitamin C0 mg0 mg
Vitamin A0 ug0 ug
Vitamin E39 mg32 mg
Cholesterol0 mg0 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Oil, almond healthier than Oil, rice bran?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Oil, almond scores higher, 54 of 100 to 43. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Oil, almond or Oil, rice bran?

Oil, almond has more protein, 0 g per 100 g to 0 g.

Full Oil, almond profile Full Oil, rice bran profile