Compare foods

Meat extender vs Soy flour, defatted

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Meat extender and Soy flour, defatted score the same on nutrient density, 89 of 100.

Meat extender and soy flour, defatted, both score 89 of 100, ranking first and second in their category, so this is a genuinely close matchup. Soy flour has more protein, 51.5 g per 100 g versus 41.7 g, while both match at 17.5 g of fiber, a notably high figure for either food. Meat extender has less fat, 2.97 g versus 1.22 g for soy flour, and considerably less sodium, 10 mg against 20 mg.

Choose soy flour when maximizing protein per 100 g is the goal. Choose meat extender when minimizing sodium matters, since 10 mg per 100 g is quite low. Both deliver identical fiber, so this comparison mostly comes down to protein versus sodium priorities rather than one being clearly superior.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricMeat extenderSoy flour, defatted
Nutrient Density Score8989
Calories311 kcal327 kcal
Protein42 g52 g
Carbohydrate35 g34 g
Dietary fiber18 g18 g
Sugars-16 g
Total fat3 g1.2 g
Saturated fat0.4 g0.1 g
Sodium10 mg20 mg
Potassium1900 mg2380 mg
Calcium204 mg241 mg
Iron12 mg9.2 mg
Magnesium216 mg290 mg
Vitamin C0 mg0 mg
Vitamin A2 ug2 ug
Vitamin E-0.1 mg
Cholesterol0 mg0 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Which has more protein, Meat extender or Soy flour, defatted?

Soy flour, defatted has more protein, 51.5 g per 100 g to 41.7 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Meat extender is lower in calories, 311 kcal per 100 g to 327 kcal.

Full Meat extender profile Full Soy flour, defatted profile