Compare foods

Game meat, elk, raw vs Game meat, squirrel, raw

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Game meat, elk, raw and Game meat, squirrel, raw score the same on nutrient density, 81 of 100.

Elk and squirrel post the same nutrient density score, 81 of 100, so this is a close call decided by the details. Elk runs leaner across the board: 111 calories per 100g versus squirrel's 120, just 1.45g fat against 3.21g, and less than half the sodium at 58mg versus 103mg. Elk also edges ahead on protein, 23g versus 21.2g, making it the more efficient of the two per 100g.

Choose elk when you want lower calories, lower fat, and lower sodium in the same serving; choose squirrel only if availability or preparation makes it the practical option, since the numbers do not favor it here. The honest note is that with identical scores, this pair comes down to elk's consistently lower fat and sodium rather than any real gap in overall nutrient density.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricGame meat, elkGame meat, squirrel
Nutrient Density Score8181
Calories111 kcal120 kcal
Protein23 g21 g
Carbohydrate0 g0 g
Dietary fiber0 g0 g
Sugars--
Total fat1.5 g3.2 g
Saturated fat0.5 g0.4 g
Sodium58 mg103 mg
Potassium312 mg304 mg
Calcium4 mg2 mg
Iron2.8 mg4.7 mg
Magnesium23 mg24 mg
Vitamin C0 mg0 mg
Vitamin A0 ug0 ug
Vitamin E--
Cholesterol55 mg83 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Which has more protein, Game meat, elk, raw or Game meat, squirrel, raw?

Game meat, elk, raw has more protein, 23 g per 100 g to 21.2 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Game meat, elk, raw is lower in calories, 111 kcal per 100 g to 120 kcal.

Full Game meat, elk profile Full Game meat, squirrel profile