Compare foods

Game meat, beaver, raw vs Game meat, moose, raw

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Game meat, moose, raw is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 85 of 100 to 84 for Game meat, beaver, raw.

Raw moose scores higher on nutrient density, 85 of 100 versus 84 of 100 for raw beaver, driven largely by fat and calories rather than protein. Moose carries just 0.74 g of fat per 100 g and 102 calories, compared to beaver's 4.8 g of fat and 146 calories, a substantial gap for game meats. Beaver does supply more protein, 24 g per 100 g against moose's 22.2 g, and slightly less sodium, 51 mg versus 65 mg.

Choose moose when a leaner, lower-calorie game meat is the goal, since the fat difference here is large. Choose beaver when maximizing protein per 100 g matters more than trimming fat and calories. The score gap is small, but the underlying fat and calorie numbers make moose the clearly leaner option of the two.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricGame meat, beaverGame meat, moose
Nutrient Density Score8485
Calories146 kcal102 kcal
Protein24 g22 g
Carbohydrate0 g0 g
Dietary fiber0 g0 g
Sugars--
Total fat4.8 g0.7 g
Saturated fat-0.2 g
Sodium51 mg65 mg
Potassium348 mg317 mg
Calcium15 mg5 mg
Iron6.9 mg3.2 mg
Magnesium25 mg23 mg
Vitamin C2 mg4 mg
Vitamin A0 ug0 ug
Vitamin E--
Cholesterol-59 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Game meat, moose, raw healthier than Game meat, beaver, raw?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Game meat, moose, raw scores higher, 85 of 100 to 84. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Game meat, beaver, raw or Game meat, moose, raw?

Game meat, beaver, raw has more protein, 24 g per 100 g to 22.2 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Game meat, moose, raw is lower in calories, 102 kcal per 100 g to 146 kcal.

Full Game meat, beaver profile Full Game meat, moose profile