Compare foods

Emu, inside drum, raw vs Emu, outside drum, raw

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Emu, outside drum, raw is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 87 of 100 to 86 for Emu, inside drum, raw.

Emu outside drum again scores higher, 87 of 100 versus 86 of 100 for inside drum, on a leaner nutrient profile per 100 g. Outside drum has less fat (0.48 g vs 1.49 g) and fewer calories (103 vs 108), plus slightly more protein (23.1 g vs 22.2 g). Sodium is nearly identical between the two, 100 mg versus 102 mg.

Choose outside drum when you want the leanest, most protein-dense of the emu drum cuts. Choose inside drum if it is what is available, since the gap is small and sodium is close to a wash. At 87 versus 86, this comes down to fat content more than anything else.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricEmu, inside drumEmu, outside drum
Nutrient Density Score8687
Calories108 kcal103 kcal
Protein22 g23 g
Carbohydrate0 g0 g
Dietary fiber0 g0 g
Sugars0 g0 g
Total fat1.5 g0.5 g
Saturated fat0.4 g0.1 g
Sodium102 mg100 mg
Potassium318 mg320 mg
Calcium4 mg3 mg
Iron5.2 mg4.5 mg
Magnesium26 mg29 mg
Vitamin C0 mg0 mg
Vitamin A5 ug0 ug
Vitamin E0.2 mg0.2 mg
Cholesterol67 mg78 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Emu, outside drum, raw healthier than Emu, inside drum, raw?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Emu, outside drum, raw scores higher, 87 of 100 to 86. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Emu, inside drum, raw or Emu, outside drum, raw?

Emu, outside drum, raw has more protein, 23.1 g per 100 g to 22.2 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Emu, outside drum, raw is lower in calories, 103 kcal per 100 g to 108 kcal.

Full Emu, inside drum profile Full Emu, outside drum profile