Emu, full rump, raw vs Emu, inside drum, raw
Original comparison by NutriVerdict
Bottom line: Emu, full rump, raw and Emu, inside drum, raw score the same on nutrient density, 86 of 100.
Emu full rump and emu inside drum score identically for nutrient density, 86 of 100 each, so the differences come down to individual numbers per 100 g. Full rump carries more calories (112 vs 108) and more fat (1.64 g vs 1.49 g), but also slightly more protein (22.8 g vs 22.2 g). Inside drum runs higher in sodium, 102 mg versus full rump's 90 mg.
Choose full rump when protein per 100 g matters most, since it edges out inside drum by 0.6 g. Choose inside drum when trimming fat and calories slightly is the goal, keeping in mind it carries more sodium than full rump. With equal scores of 86, this pairing is close nutritionally, so cut preference can decide.
Head to head, per 100 g
| Metric | Emu, full rump | Emu, inside drum |
|---|---|---|
| Nutrient Density Score | 86 | 86 |
| Calories | 112 kcal | 108 kcal |
| Protein | 23 g | 22 g |
| Carbohydrate | 0 g | 0 g |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Total fat | 1.6 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Sodium | 90 mg | 102 mg |
| Potassium | 330 mg | 318 mg |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 4 mg |
| Iron | 5 mg | 5.2 mg |
| Magnesium | 40 mg | 26 mg |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 0 mg |
| Vitamin A | 4 ug | 5 ug |
| Vitamin E | 0.2 mg | 0.2 mg |
| Cholesterol | 85 mg | 67 mg |
Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain
Frequently asked questions
Which has more protein, Emu, full rump, raw or Emu, inside drum, raw?
Emu, full rump, raw has more protein, 22.8 g per 100 g to 22.2 g.
Which has fewer calories?
Emu, inside drum, raw is lower in calories, 108 kcal per 100 g to 112 kcal.