Compare foods

Emu, flat fillet, raw vs Emu, inside drum, raw

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Emu, flat fillet, raw and Emu, inside drum, raw score the same on nutrient density, 86 of 100.

Emu flat fillet and emu inside drum share the same nutrient density score, 86 of 100, with protein essentially equal at 22.2 g per 100 g for both. Flat fillet has fewer calories (102 vs 108) and less fat (0.74 g vs 1.49 g), but far more sodium, 150 mg against inside drum's 102 mg.

Choose flat fillet when calories and fat are the main concern, since it beats inside drum on both. Choose inside drum when sodium needs to stay lower, as the gap there is meaningful at roughly 48 mg per 100 g. With identical scores of 86, this is a genuine trade-off between fat and calories on one side and sodium on the other.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricEmu, flat filletEmu, inside drum
Nutrient Density Score8686
Calories102 kcal108 kcal
Protein22 g22 g
Carbohydrate0 g0 g
Dietary fiber0 g0 g
Sugars0 g0 g
Total fat0.7 g1.5 g
Saturated fat0.2 g0.4 g
Sodium150 mg102 mg
Potassium240 mg318 mg
Calcium3 mg4 mg
Iron5 mg5.2 mg
Magnesium31 mg26 mg
Vitamin C0 mg0 mg
Vitamin A0 ug5 ug
Vitamin E0.2 mg0.2 mg
Cholesterol71 mg67 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Which has more protein, Emu, flat fillet, raw or Emu, inside drum, raw?

Emu, flat fillet, raw has more protein, 22.2 g per 100 g to 22.2 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Emu, flat fillet, raw is lower in calories, 102 kcal per 100 g to 108 kcal.

Full Emu, flat fillet profile Full Emu, inside drum profile