Emu, fan fillet, raw vs Emu, outside drum, raw
Original comparison by NutriVerdict
Bottom line: Emu, fan fillet, raw and Emu, outside drum, raw score the same on nutrient density, 87 of 100.
These two emu cuts share an identical nutrient density score, 87 of 100 each, and nearly identical calories at 103 per 100g. The outside drum edges ahead slightly in protein, 23.1g versus 22.5g, and is lower in fat, 0.48g against 0.8g, while the fan fillet carries a touch more sodium, 120mg versus 100mg. Both are free of carbs, fiber, and sugar.
Choose emu outside drum raw for marginally more protein and less fat per 100g. Choose emu fan fillet raw if the small sodium difference is not a concern, since the two cuts are otherwise nutritionally close. With matching scores and near-identical macros, either cut serves the same role in a meal; the choice here is closer to a matter of cut preference than nutrition.
Head to head, per 100 g
| Metric | Emu, fan fillet | Emu, outside drum |
|---|---|---|
| Nutrient Density Score | 87 | 87 |
| Calories | 103 kcal | 103 kcal |
| Protein | 23 g | 23 g |
| Carbohydrate | 0 g | 0 g |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Total fat | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sodium | 120 mg | 100 mg |
| Potassium | 300 mg | 320 mg |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 3 mg |
| Iron | 4.5 mg | 4.5 mg |
| Magnesium | 42 mg | 29 mg |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 0 mg |
| Vitamin A | 0 ug | 0 ug |
| Vitamin E | 0.2 mg | 0.2 mg |
| Cholesterol | 71 mg | 78 mg |
Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain
Frequently asked questions
Which has more protein, Emu, fan fillet, raw or Emu, outside drum, raw?
Emu, outside drum, raw has more protein, 23.1 g per 100 g to 22.5 g.