Compare foods

Collards, raw vs Kale, raw

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Collards, raw and Kale, raw score the same on nutrient density, 99 of 100.

Collards and kale both score 99 of 100 for nutrient density. Collards carry markedly less sodium (17 mg vs 53 mg per 100 g) and less fat (0.61 g vs 1.49 g), while offering slightly more protein (3.02 g vs 2.92 g). Kale has marginally more fiber (4.1 g vs 4 g) and more calories (35 vs 32).

Choose collards when lower sodium and lower fat matter, since the gap on both is sizable for otherwise similar greens. Choose kale if a small fiber edge or its common use raw in salads suits the meal better. The scores are effectively tied, so this comes down to preparation and the sodium difference.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricCollards, rawKale, raw
Nutrient Density Score9999
Calories32 kcal35 kcal
Protein3 g2.9 g
Carbohydrate5.4 g4.4 g
Dietary fiber4 g4.1 g
Sugars0.5 g1 g
Total fat0.6 g1.5 g
Saturated fat0.1 g0.2 g
Sodium17 mg53 mg
Potassium213 mg348 mg
Calcium232 mg254 mg
Iron0.5 mg1.6 mg
Magnesium27 mg33 mg
Vitamin C35 mg93 mg
Vitamin A251 ug241 ug
Vitamin E2.3 mg0.7 mg
Cholesterol0 mg0 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Which has more protein, Collards, raw or Kale, raw?

Collards, raw has more protein, 3 g per 100 g to 2.9 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Collards, raw is lower in calories, 32 kcal per 100 g to 35 kcal.

Which has more fiber?

Kale, raw has more dietary fiber, 4.1 g per 100 g to 4 g.

Full Collards, raw profile Full Kale, raw profile