Compare foods

Oat bran, raw vs Wheat germ, crude

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Oat bran, raw is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 86 of 100 to 78 for Wheat germ, crude.

Oat bran, raw scores 86 of 100, clearly ahead of wheat germ, crude at 78 of 100. Wheat germ has more protein (23.2 g vs 17.3 g) and more calories (360 vs 246 per 100 g), but oat bran, raw brings more fiber (15.4 g vs 13.2 g) and far less sodium, 4 mg versus 12 mg. Wheat germ also has more fat, 9.72 g against 7.03 g.

Choose oat bran, raw when you want lower sodium and slightly more fiber for the same weight. Choose wheat germ, crude when protein density is the priority, since it delivers noticeably more per 100 g. The eight-point score gap favors oat bran overall, but wheat germ's protein edge makes it a reasonable trade for some recipes.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricOat bran, rawWheat germ, crude
Nutrient Density Score8678
Calories246 kcal360 kcal
Protein17 g23 g
Carbohydrate66 g52 g
Dietary fiber15 g13 g
Sugars1.5 g-
Total fat7 g9.7 g
Saturated fat1.3 g1.7 g
Sodium4 mg12 mg
Potassium566 mg892 mg
Calcium58 mg39 mg
Iron5.4 mg6.3 mg
Magnesium235 mg239 mg
Vitamin C0 mg0 mg
Vitamin A0 ug0 ug
Vitamin E1 mg-
Cholesterol0 mg0 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Oat bran, raw healthier than Wheat germ, crude?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Oat bran, raw scores higher, 86 of 100 to 78. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Oat bran, raw or Wheat germ, crude?

Wheat germ, crude has more protein, 23.2 g per 100 g to 17.3 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Oat bran, raw is lower in calories, 246 kcal per 100 g to 360 kcal.

Which has more fiber?

Oat bran, raw has more dietary fiber, 15.4 g per 100 g to 13.2 g.

Full Oat bran, raw profile Full Wheat germ, crude profile