Compare foods

Oat bran, cooked vs Rye flour, dark

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Oat bran, cooked is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 87 of 100 to 83 for Rye flour, dark.

Oat bran, cooked scores 87 of 100, ahead of rye flour, dark at 83 of 100, though cooked oat bran's advantage owes much to water content: it has only 40 calories per 100 g against 325 for rye flour. Rye flour, dark carries considerably more protein (15.9 g vs 3.21 g) and fiber (23.8 g vs 2.6 g), reflecting its dry, dense form, along with more sodium, 2 mg versus 1 mg.

Choose oat bran, cooked when you want a big, low-calorie bowl of cereal. Choose rye flour, dark when baking, since it delivers substantially more protein and fiber per 100 g in its dry state. Because one figure is cooked and the other is flour, a direct nutrient-for-nutrient swap is not accurate without adjusting for water.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricOat bran, cookedRye flour, dark
Nutrient Density Score8783
Calories40 kcal325 kcal
Protein3.2 g16 g
Carbohydrate11 g69 g
Dietary fiber2.6 g24 g
Sugars-2.3 g
Total fat0.9 g2.2 g
Saturated fat0.2 g0.3 g
Sodium1 mg2 mg
Potassium92 mg717 mg
Calcium10 mg37 mg
Iron0.9 mg5 mg
Magnesium40 mg160 mg
Vitamin C0 mg0 mg
Vitamin A0 ug1 ug
Vitamin E-2.7 mg
Cholesterol0 mg0 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Oat bran, cooked healthier than Rye flour, dark?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Oat bran, cooked scores higher, 87 of 100 to 83. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Oat bran, cooked or Rye flour, dark?

Rye flour, dark has more protein, 15.9 g per 100 g to 3.2 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Oat bran, cooked is lower in calories, 40 kcal per 100 g to 325 kcal.

Which has more fiber?

Rye flour, dark has more dietary fiber, 23.8 g per 100 g to 2.6 g.

Full Oat bran, cooked profile Full Rye flour, dark profile