Compare foods

Oat bran, cooked vs Oat bran, raw

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Oat bran, cooked is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 87 of 100 to 86 for Oat bran, raw.

Oat bran, cooked and oat bran, raw score nearly the same, 87 of 100 versus 86 of 100, since they are the same food at different preparation stages. The real difference is water dilution: cooked oat bran has just 40 calories, 3.21 g protein, and 2.6 g fiber per 100 g, while raw oat bran concentrates those same nutrients into 246 calories, 17.3 g protein, and 15.4 g fiber. Sodium stays low either way, 1 mg cooked versus 4 mg raw.

Choose cooked oat bran when you want a large, low-calorie bowl for the same nutrients. Choose raw oat bran when measuring by dry weight for baking or when you want a denser protein and fiber hit per 100 g. The near-identical scores confirm this is really a portion-size choice, not a nutrient one.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricOat bran, cookedOat bran, raw
Nutrient Density Score8786
Calories40 kcal246 kcal
Protein3.2 g17 g
Carbohydrate11 g66 g
Dietary fiber2.6 g15 g
Sugars-1.5 g
Total fat0.9 g7 g
Saturated fat0.2 g1.3 g
Sodium1 mg4 mg
Potassium92 mg566 mg
Calcium10 mg58 mg
Iron0.9 mg5.4 mg
Magnesium40 mg235 mg
Vitamin C0 mg0 mg
Vitamin A0 ug0 ug
Vitamin E-1 mg
Cholesterol0 mg0 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Oat bran, cooked healthier than Oat bran, raw?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Oat bran, cooked scores higher, 87 of 100 to 86. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Oat bran, cooked or Oat bran, raw?

Oat bran, raw has more protein, 17.3 g per 100 g to 3.2 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Oat bran, cooked is lower in calories, 40 kcal per 100 g to 246 kcal.

Which has more fiber?

Oat bran, raw has more dietary fiber, 15.4 g per 100 g to 2.6 g.

Full Oat bran, cooked profile Full Oat bran, raw profile