Compare foods

Mulberries, raw vs Rhubarb, raw

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Rhubarb, raw is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 94 of 100 to 93 for Mulberries, raw.

Rhubarb scores slightly higher for nutrient density, 94 of 100 against mulberries at 93 of 100. Rhubarb runs far lower in calories, 21 versus 43 per 100 g, and much lower in sugar, 1.1 g against 8.1 g, while carrying about half the sodium, 4 mg versus 10 mg. Mulberries do offer more protein, 1.44 g against 0.9 g.

Choose rhubarb when you want a low-calorie, low-sugar stalk for cooking into pies, sauces, or savory sides. Choose mulberries when you want a naturally sweet fruit with a bit more protein and are less concerned about sugar content. The scores sit close together, so the sugar and calorie gap is the more practical deciding factor than the density scores themselves.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricMulberries, rawRhubarb, raw
Nutrient Density Score9394
Calories43 kcal21 kcal
Protein1.4 g0.9 g
Carbohydrate9.8 g4.5 g
Dietary fiber1.7 g1.8 g
Sugars8.1 g1.1 g
Total fat0.4 g0.2 g
Saturated fat0 g0.1 g
Sodium10 mg4 mg
Potassium194 mg288 mg
Calcium39 mg86 mg
Iron1.9 mg0.2 mg
Magnesium18 mg12 mg
Vitamin C36 mg8 mg
Vitamin A1 ug5 ug
Vitamin E0.9 mg0.3 mg
Cholesterol0 mg0 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Rhubarb, raw healthier than Mulberries, raw?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Rhubarb, raw scores higher, 94 of 100 to 93. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Mulberries, raw or Rhubarb, raw?

Mulberries, raw has more protein, 1.4 g per 100 g to 0.9 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Rhubarb, raw is lower in calories, 21 kcal per 100 g to 43 kcal.

Which has more fiber?

Rhubarb, raw has more dietary fiber, 1.8 g per 100 g to 1.7 g.

Full Mulberries, raw profile Full Rhubarb, raw profile