Compare foods

Limes, raw vs Mulberries, raw

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Limes, raw is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 94 of 100 to 93 for Mulberries, raw.

Limes edge out mulberries for nutrient density, 94 of 100 versus 93 of 100. Limes are notably lower in calories, 30 versus 43 per 100 g, and much lower in sugar, 1.69 g against 8.1 g, while mulberries deliver more protein (1.44 g vs 0.7 g) and considerably more sodium (10 mg vs 2 mg).

Choose limes when you want a low-sugar, low-calorie citrus flavor for drinks or dressings. Choose mulberries when you want a naturally sweeter fruit with a bit more protein per serving. The scores are only one point apart, so this comparison comes down to sugar tolerance and calorie needs more than overall nutrient density. Mulberries' higher sugar content is the main tradeoff to weigh.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricLimes, rawMulberries, raw
Nutrient Density Score9493
Calories30 kcal43 kcal
Protein0.7 g1.4 g
Carbohydrate11 g9.8 g
Dietary fiber2.8 g1.7 g
Sugars1.7 g8.1 g
Total fat0.2 g0.4 g
Saturated fat0 g0 g
Sodium2 mg10 mg
Potassium102 mg194 mg
Calcium33 mg39 mg
Iron0.6 mg1.9 mg
Magnesium6 mg18 mg
Vitamin C29 mg36 mg
Vitamin A2 ug1 ug
Vitamin E0.2 mg0.9 mg
Cholesterol0 mg0 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Limes, raw healthier than Mulberries, raw?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Limes, raw scores higher, 94 of 100 to 93. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Limes, raw or Mulberries, raw?

Mulberries, raw has more protein, 1.4 g per 100 g to 0.7 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Limes, raw is lower in calories, 30 kcal per 100 g to 43 kcal.

Which has more fiber?

Limes, raw has more dietary fiber, 2.8 g per 100 g to 1.7 g.

Full Limes, raw profile Full Mulberries, raw profile