Compare foods

Lentils, raw vs Quinoa, uncooked

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Lentils, raw is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 70 of 100 to 68 for Quinoa, uncooked.

These two score close, lentils at 70 of 100 and quinoa at 68 of 100. Per 100g raw, lentils have notably more protein (24.6g vs 14.1g) and more fiber (10.7g vs 7g), while quinoa has more fat (6.07g vs 1.06g) and slightly more calories (368 vs 352). Sodium is minimal and nearly identical for both (6mg vs 5mg).

Choose lentils when you want the highest protein and fiber per 100g among the two. Choose quinoa when you want a grain-like texture with more fat content, useful if you are not relying on it for protein alone. One honest note: sugar data for quinoa is not available, so that specific comparison could not be made.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricLentils, rawQuinoa, uncooked
Nutrient Density Score7068
Calories352 kcal368 kcal
Protein25 g14 g
Carbohydrate63 g64 g
Dietary fiber11 g7 g
Sugars2 g-
Total fat1.1 g6.1 g
Saturated fat0.2 g0.7 g
Sodium6 mg5 mg
Potassium677 mg563 mg
Calcium35 mg47 mg
Iron6.5 mg4.6 mg
Magnesium47 mg197 mg
Vitamin C4.5 mg-
Vitamin A2 ug1 ug
Vitamin E0.5 mg2.4 mg
Cholesterol0 mg0 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Lentils, raw healthier than Quinoa, uncooked?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Lentils, raw scores higher, 70 of 100 to 68. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Lentils, raw or Quinoa, uncooked?

Lentils, raw has more protein, 24.6 g per 100 g to 14.1 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Lentils, raw is lower in calories, 352 kcal per 100 g to 368 kcal.

Which has more fiber?

Lentils, raw has more dietary fiber, 10.7 g per 100 g to 7 g.

Full Lentils, raw profile Full Quinoa, uncooked profile