Compare foods

Gooseberries, raw vs Rhubarb, raw

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Rhubarb, raw is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 94 of 100 to 93 for Gooseberries, raw.

Rhubarb scores slightly higher for nutrient density, 94 of 100, versus gooseberries at 93 of 100. Gooseberries carry more than twice the fiber, 4.3 g per 100 g against 1.8 g in rhubarb, and less sodium, 1 mg versus 4 mg, but they also run higher in calories, 44 versus 21, and carbohydrate, 10.2 g against 4.54 g.

Choose gooseberries when fiber is the priority, such as in a fruit salad or baked dessert. Choose rhubarb when you want a lower-calorie, lower-carbohydrate stalk for pies or compotes. The one-point score gap makes this a close call, and sugar content for gooseberries is not reported here, so a full sweetness comparison between the two is not possible.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricGooseberries, rawRhubarb, raw
Nutrient Density Score9394
Calories44 kcal21 kcal
Protein0.9 g0.9 g
Carbohydrate10 g4.5 g
Dietary fiber4.3 g1.8 g
Sugars-1.1 g
Total fat0.6 g0.2 g
Saturated fat0 g0.1 g
Sodium1 mg4 mg
Potassium198 mg288 mg
Calcium25 mg86 mg
Iron0.3 mg0.2 mg
Magnesium10 mg12 mg
Vitamin C28 mg8 mg
Vitamin A15 ug5 ug
Vitamin E0.4 mg0.3 mg
Cholesterol0 mg0 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Rhubarb, raw healthier than Gooseberries, raw?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Rhubarb, raw scores higher, 94 of 100 to 93. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Gooseberries, raw or Rhubarb, raw?

Rhubarb, raw has more protein, 0.9 g per 100 g to 0.9 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Rhubarb, raw is lower in calories, 21 kcal per 100 g to 44 kcal.

Which has more fiber?

Gooseberries, raw has more dietary fiber, 4.3 g per 100 g to 1.8 g.

Full Gooseberries, raw profile Full Rhubarb, raw profile