Emu, full rump, raw vs Emu, outside drum, raw
Original comparison by NutriVerdict
Bottom line: Emu, outside drum, raw is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 87 of 100 to 86 for Emu, full rump, raw.
Emu outside drum scores higher for nutrient density, 87 of 100 against 86 of 100 for full rump, largely on a leaner fat profile. Outside drum has less than a third of the fat (0.48 g vs 1.64 g) and fewer calories (103 vs 112) per 100 g, with protein slightly higher too (23.1 g vs 22.8 g). Full rump does have a modest sodium edge, 90 mg versus 100 mg.
Choose outside drum when minimizing fat and calories is the priority, since it beats full rump on both while still delivering more protein. Choose full rump only if that small sodium difference matters to your daily target. With scores of 87 and 86, both cuts remain strong lean-protein choices from the same bird.
Head to head, per 100 g
| Metric | Emu, full rump | Emu, outside drum |
|---|---|---|
| Nutrient Density Score | 86 | 87 |
| Calories | 112 kcal | 103 kcal |
| Protein | 23 g | 23 g |
| Carbohydrate | 0 g | 0 g |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Total fat | 1.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Sodium | 90 mg | 100 mg |
| Potassium | 330 mg | 320 mg |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 3 mg |
| Iron | 5 mg | 4.5 mg |
| Magnesium | 40 mg | 29 mg |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 0 mg |
| Vitamin A | 4 ug | 0 ug |
| Vitamin E | 0.2 mg | 0.2 mg |
| Cholesterol | 85 mg | 78 mg |
Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain
Frequently asked questions
Is Emu, outside drum, raw healthier than Emu, full rump, raw?
On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Emu, outside drum, raw scores higher, 87 of 100 to 86. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.
Which has more protein, Emu, full rump, raw or Emu, outside drum, raw?
Emu, outside drum, raw has more protein, 23.1 g per 100 g to 22.8 g.
Which has fewer calories?
Emu, outside drum, raw is lower in calories, 103 kcal per 100 g to 112 kcal.