Emu, flat fillet, raw vs Emu, full rump, raw
Original comparison by NutriVerdict
Bottom line: Emu, flat fillet, raw and Emu, full rump, raw score the same on nutrient density, 86 of 100.
Emu flat fillet and emu full rump both score 86 of 100 for nutrient density, so the two cuts trade off on specific numbers per 100 g. Flat fillet is lower in calories (102 vs 112) and fat (0.74 g vs 1.64 g), while full rump has slightly more protein (22.8 g vs 22.2 g) and notably less sodium (90 mg vs 150 mg).
Choose flat fillet when cutting fat and calories is the priority. Choose full rump when sodium intake needs to stay low, since flat fillet runs well above it at 150 mg per 100 g. Scores being tied at 86 means neither cut has an overall edge, so pick based on which number matters more to your diet.
Head to head, per 100 g
| Metric | Emu, flat fillet | Emu, full rump |
|---|---|---|
| Nutrient Density Score | 86 | 86 |
| Calories | 102 kcal | 112 kcal |
| Protein | 22 g | 23 g |
| Carbohydrate | 0 g | 0 g |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Total fat | 0.7 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Sodium | 150 mg | 90 mg |
| Potassium | 240 mg | 330 mg |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 4 mg |
| Iron | 5 mg | 5 mg |
| Magnesium | 31 mg | 40 mg |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 0 mg |
| Vitamin A | 0 ug | 4 ug |
| Vitamin E | 0.2 mg | 0.2 mg |
| Cholesterol | 71 mg | 85 mg |
Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain
Frequently asked questions
Which has more protein, Emu, flat fillet, raw or Emu, full rump, raw?
Emu, full rump, raw has more protein, 22.8 g per 100 g to 22.2 g.
Which has fewer calories?
Emu, flat fillet, raw is lower in calories, 102 kcal per 100 g to 112 kcal.