Compare foods

Crustaceans, shrimp, raw vs Fish, salmon, chum, raw

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Crustaceans, shrimp, raw is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 83 of 100 to 75 for Fish, salmon, chum, raw.

Shrimp scores higher for nutrient density at 83 of 100 compared to salmon's 75 of 100. Per 100g raw, protein is identical between the two (20.1g each), but shrimp has fewer calories (85 vs 120) and much less fat (0.51g vs 3.77g). Shrimp does carry more sodium (119mg vs 50mg), the one number that favors salmon.

Choose shrimp when you want a lean, high-protein option with fewer calories and less fat per 100g. Choose salmon when you want more fat content for a fuller meal, and its lower sodium (50mg vs 119mg) can matter if you are watching salt intake. One honest note: fiber and sugar data are not available for shrimp, so this comparison rests on calories, protein, fat, and sodium alone.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricCrustaceans, shrimpFish, salmon
Nutrient Density Score8375
Calories85 kcal120 kcal
Protein20 g20 g
Carbohydrate0 g0 g
Dietary fiber-0 g
Sugars--
Total fat0.5 g3.8 g
Saturated fat0.1 g0.8 g
Sodium119 mg50 mg
Potassium264 mg429 mg
Calcium64 mg11 mg
Iron0.5 mg0.6 mg
Magnesium35 mg22 mg
Vitamin C-0 mg
Vitamin A-30 ug
Vitamin E-1.1 mg
Cholesterol161 mg74 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Crustaceans, shrimp, raw healthier than Fish, salmon, chum, raw?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Crustaceans, shrimp, raw scores higher, 83 of 100 to 75. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Crustaceans, shrimp, raw or Fish, salmon, chum, raw?

Crustaceans, shrimp, raw has more protein, 20.1 g per 100 g to 20.1 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Crustaceans, shrimp, raw is lower in calories, 85 kcal per 100 g to 120 kcal.

Full Crustaceans, shrimp profile Full Fish, salmon profile