Compare foods

Corn bran, crude vs Wheat bran, crude

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Wheat bran, crude is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 96 of 100 to 91 for Corn bran, crude.

Wheat bran scores higher for nutrient density, 96 of 100, versus corn bran at 91 of 100. Corn bran actually delivers far more fiber, 79 g per 100 g against 42.8 g in wheat bran, and has no sugar, but wheat bran provides nearly double the protein, 15.6 g versus 8.36 g, less carbohydrate, 64.5 g against 85.6 g, and lower sodium, 2 mg versus 7 mg.

Choose corn bran when maximum fiber per serving is the goal and protein is not the priority. Choose wheat bran when protein content and a lower sodium, lower carbohydrate profile matter more. The five-point score gap reflects wheat bran's more balanced macronutrient mix despite corn bran's exceptional fiber number.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricCorn bran, crudeWheat bran, crude
Nutrient Density Score9196
Calories224 kcal216 kcal
Protein8.4 g16 g
Carbohydrate86 g65 g
Dietary fiber79 g43 g
Sugars0 g0.4 g
Total fat0.9 g4.3 g
Saturated fat0.1 g0.6 g
Sodium7 mg2 mg
Potassium44 mg1180 mg
Calcium42 mg73 mg
Iron2.8 mg11 mg
Magnesium64 mg611 mg
Vitamin C0 mg0 mg
Vitamin A4 ug0 ug
Vitamin E0.4 mg1.5 mg
Cholesterol0 mg0 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Wheat bran, crude healthier than Corn bran, crude?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Wheat bran, crude scores higher, 96 of 100 to 91. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Corn bran, crude or Wheat bran, crude?

Wheat bran, crude has more protein, 15.6 g per 100 g to 8.4 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Wheat bran, crude is lower in calories, 216 kcal per 100 g to 224 kcal.

Which has more fiber?

Corn bran, crude has more dietary fiber, 79 g per 100 g to 42.8 g.

Full Corn bran, crude profile Full Wheat bran, crude profile