Compare foods

Corn bran, crude vs Rice bran, crude

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Rice bran, crude is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 93 of 100 to 91 for Corn bran, crude.

Rice bran scores slightly higher for nutrient density, 93 of 100, compared with corn bran at 91 of 100. Corn bran has almost four times the fiber, 79 g per 100 g against 21 g in rice bran, and no sugar, while rice bran carries more protein, 13.4 g versus 8.36 g, but also far more fat, 20.8 g against 0.92 g, and more calories, 316 versus 224.

Choose corn bran when fiber is the main goal and you want a low-fat, low-calorie option. Choose rice bran when more protein and a fattier, more calorie-dense bran fit the recipe, such as in oil-rich baking. The two-point score gap is modest, so the fiber-versus-fat tradeoff is the more meaningful distinction between them.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricCorn bran, crudeRice bran, crude
Nutrient Density Score9193
Calories224 kcal316 kcal
Protein8.4 g13 g
Carbohydrate86 g50 g
Dietary fiber79 g21 g
Sugars0 g0.9 g
Total fat0.9 g21 g
Saturated fat0.1 g4.2 g
Sodium7 mg5 mg
Potassium44 mg1480 mg
Calcium42 mg57 mg
Iron2.8 mg19 mg
Magnesium64 mg781 mg
Vitamin C0 mg0 mg
Vitamin A4 ug0 ug
Vitamin E0.4 mg4.9 mg
Cholesterol0 mg0 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Rice bran, crude healthier than Corn bran, crude?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Rice bran, crude scores higher, 93 of 100 to 91. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Corn bran, crude or Rice bran, crude?

Rice bran, crude has more protein, 13.4 g per 100 g to 8.4 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Corn bran, crude is lower in calories, 224 kcal per 100 g to 316 kcal.

Which has more fiber?

Corn bran, crude has more dietary fiber, 79 g per 100 g to 21 g.

Full Corn bran, crude profile Full Rice bran, crude profile