Compare foods

Corn bran, crude vs Oat bran, raw

Original comparison by NutriVerdict

Bottom line: Corn bran, crude is the more nutrient-dense of the two, scoring 91 of 100 to 86 for Oat bran, raw.

Corn bran, crude scores 91 of 100, just ahead of oat bran, raw at 86 of 100, largely because of fiber: 79 g per 100 g versus 15.4 g. Oat bran, raw has notably more protein (17.3 g vs 8.36 g) and more fat (7.03 g vs 0.92 g), while corn bran has more carbohydrate (85.6 g vs 66.2 g) and slightly fewer calories, 224 versus 246. Sodium is modest in both, 7 mg and 4 mg respectively.

Choose corn bran, crude when maximizing fiber per 100 g is the goal. Choose oat bran, raw when you want more protein and fat alongside fewer carbs, useful in baking or as a cereal additive. Both scores sit close together, so either fits a fiber-forward pantry staple depending on the recipe.

Head to head, per 100 g

MetricCorn bran, crudeOat bran, raw
Nutrient Density Score9186
Calories224 kcal246 kcal
Protein8.4 g17 g
Carbohydrate86 g66 g
Dietary fiber79 g15 g
Sugars0 g1.5 g
Total fat0.9 g7 g
Saturated fat0.1 g1.3 g
Sodium7 mg4 mg
Potassium44 mg566 mg
Calcium42 mg58 mg
Iron2.8 mg5.4 mg
Magnesium64 mg235 mg
Vitamin C0 mg0 mg
Vitamin A4 ug0 ug
Vitamin E0.4 mg1 mg
Cholesterol0 mg0 mg

Source: USDA FoodData Central · Public domain

Frequently asked questions

Is Corn bran, crude healthier than Oat bran, raw?

On our Nutrient Density Score, which measures beneficial nutrients per calorie, Corn bran, crude scores higher, 91 of 100 to 86. Both can fit a balanced diet; the score reflects nutrients per calorie, not a whole-diet judgement.

Which has more protein, Corn bran, crude or Oat bran, raw?

Oat bran, raw has more protein, 17.3 g per 100 g to 8.4 g.

Which has fewer calories?

Corn bran, crude is lower in calories, 224 kcal per 100 g to 246 kcal.

Which has more fiber?

Corn bran, crude has more dietary fiber, 79 g per 100 g to 15.4 g.

Full Corn bran, crude profile Full Oat bran, raw profile